Ofsted Visit Analysis – Page 4

All the data on these pages have been produced by SESLIP analysis of information published at Ofsted’s report pages, which involves manual data transfer and is therefore subject to errors and omissions. If you spot anything that looks wrong, please contact Richard Tyndall.

Two young students, one of whom is writing in a book, the other of whom is leaning in closely, looking

Waiting times since the start of last Ofsted full inspection visit – all authorities and south east authorities

Table 4.1: Number of days since the start of last Ofsted full inspection visit with a published report as at 04/02/2025

SE
Rank
South East LAsTypeGradeDays waitedNtl
Rank
153
1BuckinghamshireILACS1Requires Improvement1,15613
2SurreyILACS1Requires Improvement1,11414
3West BerkshireILACS1Good1,05826
4KentILACS1Outstanding1,00235
5Bracknell ForestILACS1Outstanding96737
6SloughILACS2Requires Improvement74364
7WokinghamILACS2Requires Improvement70172
8West SussexILACS2Requires Improvement69474
9PortsmouthILACS2Good63180
10SouthamptonILACS2Good61081
11MedwayILACS2Good56888
12Isle of WightILACS2Good46396
13East SussexILACS2Good421105
14OxfordshireILACS2Good358107
15Brighton and HoveILACS2Outstanding330112
16ReadingILACS2Requires Improvement288116
17HampshireILACS2Outstanding239129
18Windsor and MaidenheadILACS2Good120140
19Milton KeynesILACS2Good99144
National
Rank
of 153
National LAsTypeGradeDays
waited
1DevonILACS1Inadequate1,842
2HarrowILACS1Good1,821
3SunderlandILACS1Outstanding1,317
4DorsetILACS1Good1,226
5=WalsallILACS1Good1,219
5=North East LincolnshireILACS1Inadequate1,219
7BuryILACS1Inadequate1,198
8WakefieldILACS2Good1,184
9Bedford BoroughILACS1Good1.177
10WarwickshireILACS1Good1,170
11Newcastle upon TyneILACS1Good1,163
12SuttonILACS1Good1,160
13BuckinghamshireILACS1Requires Improvement1,156
14=SurreyILACS1Requires Improvement1,114
14=Central BedfordshireILACS1Good1,114
16Blackburn with DarwenILACS1Requires Improvement1,107
17Richmond upon ThamesILACS1Good1,100
18=ShropshireILACS1Good1,093
18=GloucestershireILACS1Requires Improvement1,093

Table 4.2: Last 20 published reports: number of days waited, and position on the waiting list when picked, at the start of last Ofsted full inspection

Start DateLocal AuthorityWait between inspection typeGrade BeforeGrade AfterPosition in waiting list when takenDays
waited
December 2024Bournemouth Christchurch and PooleILACS1 – ILACS2InadequateGood161,092
December 2024GatesheadILACS1 – ILACS2GoodGood12,044
December 2024IslingtonILACS1 – ILACS2OutstandingOutstanding51,729
December 2024Kingston upon ThamesILACS1 – ILACS2OutstandingOutstanding21,869
November 2024KnowsleyILACS1 – ILACS2Requires ImprovementInadequate111,134
November 2024Kensington and ChelseaILACS1 – ILACS2OutstandingOutstanding3=1,890
November 2024North TynesideILACS1 – ILACS2OutstandingOutstanding81,708
November 2024WestminsterILACS1 – ILACS2OutstandingOutstanding3=1,890
November 2024Tower HamletsILACS1 – ILACS2GoodOutstanding21,981
October 2024Milton KeynesILACS1 – ILACS2Requires ImprovementGood161,099
October 2024Southend-on-SeaILACS1 – ILACS2Requires ImprovementGood31,918
October 2024CroydonILACS1 – ILACS2GoodGood81,715
October 2024CumberlandILACS1 – ILACS2New authority – not inspectedGood92556
October 2024Windsor and MaidenheadILACS1 – ILACS2GoodGood71,729
September 2024LeicesterILACS1 – ILACS2GoodRequires Improvement151,099
September 2024City of LondonILACS1 – ILACS2OutstandingOutstanding111,666
September 2024ThurrockILACS1 – ILACS2GoodOutstandin71,771
July 2024EnfieldILACS1 – ILACS2GoodGood11,967
July 2024Cheshire West and ChesterILACS1 – ILACS2GoodRequires Improvement21,946

Table 4.3: All-time longest waits for a main inspection as at 04/02/2025

National
Rank
LAWait between inspection typeGrade beforeGrade afterDays
waited
Dates
1SeftonSIF1 – ILACS1 (no SIF2)Requires ImprovementInadequate2,191Feb 2016 – Feb 2022
2Poole (now closed)SLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)GoodRequires Improvement2,142Oct 2011 – Sep 2017
3OxfordshireILACS1 – ILACS2GoodGood2,128Apr 2018 – Feb 2024
4Brighton and HoveILACS1 – ILACS2GoodOutstanding2,072Jul 2018 – Mar 2024
5=BurySIF1 – ILACS1 (no SIF2)Requires ImprovementInadequate2,072Feb 2016 – Oct 2021
5=Blackburn with DarwenSLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)GoodGood2,072Jan 2012 – Sep 2017
7HartlepoolILACS1 – ILACS2GoodOutstanding2,065Jul 2018 – Mar 2024
8SheffieldSIF1 – ILACS1 (no SIF2)Requires ImprovementGood2,064Nov 2013 – Jul 2019
9DerbyshireSIF1 – ILACS1 (no SIF2)GoodRequires Improvement2,057Nov 2013 – Jul 2019
10WolverhamptonSLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)Requires ImprovementGood2,051Jun 2011 – Jan 2017
11GatesheadILACS1 – ILACS2GoodGood2,044Apr 2019 – Dec 2024
12=SouthwarkSIF1 – ILACS1 (no SIF2)GoodGood2,030Mar 2017 – Sep 2022
12=CamdenSLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)GoodGood2,030Feb 2012 – Sep 2017
14Richmond upon ThamesSLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)GoodGood2,016Mar 2012 – Sep 2017
15WarwickshireSIF1 – ILACS1 (no SIF2)GoodRequires Improvement2,010May 2017 – Nov 2021
16HaveringILACS1 – ILACS2GoodInadequate2,009Jun 2018 – Dec 2023
17Bracknell ForestSLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)GoodGood2,006Oct 2011 – Apr 2017
18MertonSLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)GoodGood2,005Jan 2012 – July 2017
19HillingdonILACS1 – ILACS2GoodOutstanding1,995Apr 2018 – Oct 2023
20=Waltham ForestILACS1 – ILACS2GoodGood1,988Jan 2019 – Jul 2024
20=WirralSLAC – SIF1 (no LACPI)GoodGood1,988Jan 2011 – Jul 2016
NB the database starts from the date of SLAC inspections which run between June 2009 and July 2012

All the data on these pages have been produced by SESLIP analysis of information published at Ofsted’s report pages, which involves manual data transfer and is therefore subject to errors and omissions. If you spot anything that looks wrong, please contact Richard Tyndall 07880-787007